BOEING · WATCH
INDEPENDENT · NON-AFFILIATED
METHODOLOGY CORRECTIONS SOURCES ABOUT
▎ DOCUMENT 002 · CORRECTIONS · PUBLIC LOG

THE CORRECTIONS
LOG

Every correction made to a published entry on this site is recorded here, in reverse chronological order, with the date, the entry affected, the old wording, the new wording, and the source of the correction. The log is never deleted. It is the permanent public record of the site's mistakes and the standing test of its honesty.

POLICY METHODOLOGY § 08 REPORT corrections@boeingwatch.org REVIEW WINDOW 7 DAYS ACK WINDOW 48 HOURS
HOW TO FILE A CORRECTION
§ INTAKE

Send an email to corrections@boeingwatch.org with three things:

  1. The URL of the page or entry containing the claim.
  2. The exact text of the claim you believe is wrong.
  3. The source that supports the correction — a court filing, a named-reporter article in a named publication, an FAA record, an obituary, a coroner's report, a corporate filing, or another document of equivalent standing.

You do not need to be the subject of the entry to file a correction. You do not need to give a reason beyond the source. You may file anonymously and we will not disclose your identity in any published correction.

The full procedure — receipt acknowledgement within 48 hours, review within 7 calendar days, prominence rules for material corrections — is documented in Methodology § 08.

THE LOG
§ ENTRIES
0
▎ NO CORRECTIONS ON FILE
This page has been empty since the site went live on 13 May 2026. The first correction filed against a published claim will be recorded here within seven days of receipt. The counter at the head of this section will increment by one and never reset.
WHAT IS NOT A CORRECTION
§ SCOPE

The corrections process is for factual errors in published claims. It is not the right route for the following kinds of request, which are routed elsewhere or declined:

  • Tone or framing complaints. If the underlying fact is correctly stated, no correction is filed. Editorial preferences are not corrections.
  • Removal of true information. A claim that is both factually correct and drawn from a named public source is not removed on request. The right of an individual or a corporation to a private life does not extend to acts already in the public record.
  • Anonymously sourced rebuttals. A response that cannot be attributed to a named, accountable source is not used to overturn a claim that is itself drawn from a named, accountable source.
  • Threats of legal action absent a specific factual claim. A demand letter that does not identify a specific factual error is acknowledged for the record and otherwise filed without action.

If you believe a published entry is unfair but factually correct, the right response is to publish a reply in a venue where you may be quoted by name. We will link to it from the entry on request.